Palin Can't Name a Second Supreme Court Case

Sarah Palin was asked by Katie Couric to explain why she disagreed with the Supreme Court Decision of Roe v. Wade, she explained it was a state's right's issue, Couric had a follow up question...

-----
Couric: "Do you think there's an inherent right to privacy in the Constitution?"

Palin: "I do, yeah. I do."

Couric: "That's the cornerstone of Roe v. Wade."
...
Couric: "What other Supreme Court decisions do you disagree with?"

Palin: "Mm. Well, let's see, there's, of course, in the great history of America, there have been rulings that there's never going to be absolute consensus by every American, and there are those issues, again, like Roe v. Wade, where I believe are best held on a state level and addressed there. So, you know, going through the history of America, there would be others, but..."

Couric: "Can you think of any?"

Palin: "Well, I would think of any, again, that could be best be dealt with on a more local level. Maybe I would take issue with, but, you know, as a mayor and then as a governor, and even as a vice president, if I'm so privileged to serve, would be in a position of changing those things. But in supporting the law of the land as it reads today."
-----

Considering Sarah Palin thinks creationism should be taught in public school science class, she may also disagree with the following Supreme Court Decisions, but she probably never heard of them:
Epperson v. Arkansas (1968)
McClean v. Arkansas (1981)
Segraves v. California (1981)
Edwards v. Aquillard (1987)
Webster v. New Lenox (1990)
Peloza v. Capistrano (1994)
Freiler v. Tangipahoa (1999)
LeVake v. Independent School District (2001)